"Sunday, 15 May 2011
This is an offer to Councillor Mr. Roland Chilvers, formerly Chairman of Hemingbrough’s Hagg Lane Green Conservation Group (resigned November 2007), Chairman of Hemingbrough Parish Council (resigned office October 2008) and Chairman of Hemingbrough United Charities (told by the Charity Commission in November 2010 “it would not be best practice in the circumstances for Mr Chilvers to be Chairman”, and “the trustees review and reappoint the position of Chairman as soon as possible.”)
I offer you, without qualification, my thirty years experience of painstaking, forensic analysis to identify the cowardly liar who writes, directs and controls the 43 works referred to in recent Bear Garden Blog posts, who has laid a trail of evidence towards your door, for I am certain that you would wish to identify the person who has studied your name in the public records and carried on a sustained, shameful campaign of spiteful and dishonest comments for many months.We can be almost certain the cowardly ‘Ghost’ would not register a blog in its own name; actions suggest ‘Ghost’ would hide behind a female, even a granddaughter or friend of a relative, who may not have obvious connections with Hemingbrough, but may have connections with Bishop Burton College.
We could confirm the accuracy of certain statements by, for example, asking the Hagg Lane Green Group to check their minutes on Tuesday night to see what is recorded about the competition that led to an award and a resignation. We could check with Parish Councillors to see who knew the presumably confidential number of votes cast for people offering themselves for co-option in 2007, [the June 2007 Council Minutes do not record either the names or the votes cast for the unsuccessful candidates!], and who was on the interviewing panel for the new Parish Clerk and who knew the names of the applicants, because those names were not made public.We could compare our various pieces of correspondence with the Charity Commission to identify the individual who was told so much about the Charity’s lease and other matters that they could produce nine items ‘in a nutshell’. That individual was certainly not a member of the public, so our search would be considerably narrowed. Another ‘Freedom of Information Act’ request should work nicely.
I hope we share an interest in identifying who would accuse, without any truth in the matter, a local Church Officer of ‘dismissing’ a Parochial Council Secretary. I have a particular interest in identifying who would tell the world at large I had been to see my doctor and posed the question, “Is Greig Markham ill?” We could help some of your colleagues by exposing who would accuse them of an offence under the Data Protection Act by revealing the existence of a tenancy agreement between the Charity and your son when you had said long before, and on a number of occasions, that the land your son rents from the Charity is poorly drained and of little value. I recall the occasions well because I was left wondering why he rented such apparently worthless land.
We would not be alone; we are assured of support from the many armchair analysts who have already contributed information about, for example, copies of the United Charities Constitution.We would be serving the local community because when the new Parish Council meets for the first time on Thursday next, ‘Ghost’s’ cowardly claims and fabrications will undoubtedly cause Members to look searchingly at each of their colleagues, weigh in the balance what they know, and wonder if they have a Ghost, a Snake, or both sitting in their midst.
If the shameful ‘Ghost’ is sitting in their midst, and it is likely from the ‘nutshell’ claims of what the Charity Commission told it, the new Community Parish Council elected by residents will be in danger from its very first meeting."
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.